HUNTER WALLACE: SPLC - THE ALT-RIGHT IS KILLING PEOPLE

I wasn’t going to respond to this.

It wasn’t until it was brought to my attention that I was mentioned in the article that I bothered to read it. Then I also noticed that media was uncritically spreading these claims as gospel.

Let’s scrutinize the list of the 13 alleged Alt-Right killers:

1.) Dylann Roof – Dylann Roof unambiguously falls into the category of what I have described in the past “a self detonating lone wolf vanguardist.” He was a White Nationalist lone wolf killer in the tradition of Frazier Glenn Miller, James von Brunn and Joseph Paul Franklin.

There is nothing that connects Dylann Roof to the Alt-Right except his age. It later came out at his trial that he was inspired by old Hollywood movies like American History X, Higher Learning and Romper Stomper. He was disappointed that there were “no skinheads, no real KKK, no one doing anything” in South Carolina like he saw in these movies. We also learned during his trial that Dylann Roof suffers from a number of mental illnesses and Hashimoto’s Disease.

No one at the time described Dylann Roof as an “Alt-Right killer” because there was no obvious connection to the movement. The Alt-Right later became famous during the Trump campaign. This is a mendacious attempt to smear the Alt-Right through association with Dylann Roof.

2.) James Fields, Jr. – James Fields, Jr. is an Alt-Right sympathizer.

Aside from his age, James Fields, Jr. has nothing in common with Dylann Roof. There is no proof that he came to Charlottesville with the intention to kill anyone. Dylann Roof unambiguously engaged in premeditated murder in an attempt to spark a race war. James Fields, Jr. killed someone in a traffic accident and spent the rest of the day crying in his jail cell. This isn’t similar to Dylann Roof, James Von Brunn, Glenn Miller or Joseph Paul Franklin who were ideologically driven killers.

3.) Devon Arthurs – Devon Arthurs killed his Atomwaffen roommates after he converted to Islam. He was angry that his roommates had “disrespected” Islam. He also told the police that he was motivated by US military attacks on Muslim countries. His crime was motivated by religion. He also has nothing in common with Dylann Roof and James Fields, Jr. except his age.

4.) Elliot Rodger – The Supreme Gentleman was a mixed race incel. I have no idea how Elliot Rodger has been posthumously rebranded as an “Alt-Right killer.” He wasn’t even White. No one including the SPLC labeled him an Alt-Right killer when he went on his shooting spree.

Read the rest of the article HERE

DANISH LEFT ADOPT ALT-RIGHT MIGRATION POLICY

In astounding news from Denmark, it now seems that mass immigration is creating Right-wing voters at a much faster rate than it is importing Left-wing ones. 

This was revealed by the new policy announced by the country's leading Left-wing party, the Social Democrat Party (SDP), who have now abandoned their past policy of importing voters from the Third World in favour of appealing to Danish voters not to swing Right by adopting a hard-line anti-immigration policy. 

As reported by the Zionist Breitbart news site:

Presenting an ambitious plan to slash migration from non-Western nations, Denmark’s Social Democrats said the country lacks the capacity to integrate further flows of third world migrants.

The largest party in Denmark, where it is part of the left-wing opposition, the Social Democrats on Monday unveiled a 44-page migration policy document pledging “to introduce a cap on the number of non-Western foreigners who can [enter]”.

“We want to reform our asylum system, among other things, by setting up reception centres outside Europe, and in the future it will not be possible for refugees to obtain asylum in Denmark outside quotas set by the United Nations,” said Social Democrats head Mette Frederiksen.

Under the proposals, immigrants would no longer be able to turn up “spontaneously” at Denmark’s border or migrant centres to file asylum claims, and would instead be sent to a Danish-run reception centre in North Africa while their case is examined.

If granted asylum by authorities, the refugees would remain in the yet unspecified transit country and living under the protection of the UN’s refugee agency while Copenhagen pays to cover their living expenses.

Now, let's cut to the chase. This is exactly the same kind of asylum policy that leaders of the Alt-Right would advocate -- humane yet keeping the Third World hordes at arm's length by keeping them in or near their own countries of origin, instead of bringing them into Denmark to cause crime, social disruption, extreme problems for "women's rights," and financial chaos.

But why the U-turn? The SDP, like all Left-wing parties in Europe, is extremely Machiavellian, so this decision is being made for purely selfish party political reasons. The SDP has clearly calculated that for every impossible-to-assimilate Third World migrant they bring in, more than one Dane, who formerly voted Left for SJW, feminist, or other reasons, swings to the right. 

Add to this the fact that many Third World immigrants in Denmark can't even be bothered to show their gratitude to their Leftist benefactors by voting for them, not to mention the enormous financial cost that effectively prevents the Left appealing to voters by offering more state-run social services, and you will see that this pivot to what is basically an Alt-Right policy is basically a no-brainer for the SDP.

The Danish SDP is the first Leftist party in Europe to realise this truth: that mass immigration is now creating Right-wing voters faster than it imports Leftist voters. How many more of Europe's Left-wing parties will now reach this conclusion and follow their lead? The ones that don't will be annihilated at the polls.

"FIRST BRITON" REVEALED TO HAVE A MULLET

Idiots on social media were yesterday calling for all British people to grow their hair out and get a "mullet cut" after it was revealed that Cheddar Man -- the earliest known inhabitant of the British Isles -- had a distinct mullet hairstyle.

The earth-shattering discovery came after scientists extracted DNA from the bones of Cheddar Man, whose name comes from the site of his 1903 discovery in Cheddar Gorge, Somerset.

Using new, cutting-edge DNA and facial reconstruction techniques, the scientists were able to reconstruct what Cheddar Man actually looked like, creating a waxwork head that could be photographed and shown on television.

Living around 10,000 years ago, it is believed that this ancient ancestor of all British people had dark skin and blue eyes. But the most shocking revelation -- at least for Alt-Right News -- was that he had a mullet, a form of hairstyle associated with various rock and pop musicians of the 1980s and early 90s, including Billy Ray Cyrus, Michael Bolton, and Joe Elliot out of Def Leppard. Elliot is believed to be a close relation of the original Cheddar Man as he also comes from England.

Cyrus, Bolton, and Elliot -- gathering dust in most music collections.

Survival experts believe the mullet hairstyle helped Cheddar Man stay warm -- Britain was then much colder than it is today -- while also helping him hunt his prey by keeping hair out of his eyes. 

The political repercussions of the "first Briton" having a mullet are of course enormous, and strengthen the case that only people with extremely dated CD collections should be allowed to be citizens of the UK, despite many different and better hairstyles having emerged in the period since the 1980s and the 8080s B.C.

************

In other news, it was revealed that the first modern humans to live in Jerusalem were Black, leading to calls to give the area back to Sub-Saharan Africans.

"BLACK LIVES MATTER" ACTIVIST'S LIFE DIDN'T MATTER TO BLACKS

Muhiyidin Moye was a passionate activist for the astroturf "activist" group Black Lives Matter and its billionaire donors, like George Soros.

He deeply believed in its agenda of promoting anti-White and anti-cop hatred and violence, so much so that he even leaped over police tape to snatch a raised Confederate flag from a member of the South Carolina Secessionist Party back in February last year. 

This act was quickly seized on by a compliant liberal media to turn Moye into a fake Black hero.

But now, in an act of tremendous irony, it seems that this "Black Lives Matter" activist's life didn't matter very much to other Black people, or at least the street thug who randomly shot and killed him early on Tuesday morning in the "chocolate city" of New Orleans.

As reported by the Charleston Post and Courier:

"The 32-year-old activist, who went by the last name d'Baha, was shot in the thigh on Bienville Street before 1:30 a.m., New Orleans police said.

Officers found him bleeding on the ground near a mountain bike, a report stated. They followed a trail of blood over several blocks until they found a bullet fragment elsewhere on Bienville Street.

Moye was taken to an area hospital, where he died later that morning."

His niece, Camille Weaver, wrote on a Go Fund Me page that he had been shot while riding his bicycle, suggesting a possible motive for the murder was simple bicycle theft. People are murdered for much less in America's "chocolate cities" almost everyday.

Whatever the exact circumstances of Moye's death you can be sure it will be just one more of the countless Black-on-Black murders that happen year-in-year-out without ever becoming an issue or anyone being guilt tripped over it.

If Black lives really mattered, surely Black's could make this point a lot better by not shooting each other, rather than all that other stupid shit they've been doing.

STOCK VOLATILITY: "CRASH" CAUSED BY GOOD NEWS

The modern economy

In recent days stock markets around the world have been tumbling -- and then recovering sharply. Oddly this headless chicken hysteria is not because of bad news but because of good news.

WTF, how can good news be causing such economic turbulence? The answer to this question is that the modern global economy is a clownishly complex contraption, twisted out of shape by constant interference from governments and globalists.

But back to the good news -- higher earnings and lower corporate tax -- how can it be causing such chaos and confusion?

The first of these factors raises the possibility of some workers daring to demand higher salaries, which in turn generates fears of inflation. Yes, because hard-working people might actually spend some of this money in the shops, instead of pumping it into crypto, shares, or bad modern art.

Bad modern art

In turn, this possible inflation means that banks could be forced to raise interest rates, as savers won't want to leave their money in there if it is just losing buying power. 

Higher interest rates then make borrowing more expensive -- the ultimate economic taboo in an economy now drugged to the eyeballs on cheap credit. For the same reason, inflation also pushes up the yields governments are forced to offer on their bonds in order to raise money. With government debt at record levels they need a continuous and ever supply of money through the bond markets. Rising bond yields then suck money out of the stock market, pushing down stock prices,

The second piece of good news -- lower corporate tax thanks to Trump -- can also have a lot of bad fall out in our modern Mickey Mouse economy and perversely can impact stocks. This is because companies no longer need to bury their profits in the stock market to avoid high taxes -- something they have been doing through "buy backs" of their own stock. Instead they can invest profits, as they should be invested, in increasing productivity by hiring better workers and investing in plant and equipment. This too naturally pulls money out of the stock market hitting what are actually inflated stock prices, while also contributing to wage and price inflation.

Another major factor in the demented economic equation on which the World runs is the growing pressure on the Federal Reserve to "taper" -- slowly reduce -- Quantitative Easing. This, remember, was only ever supposed to be a temporary stop-gap measure. 

This glut of money in the economy has driven borrowing costs into the ground, making debt about as cheap as breathing, which in turn has driven savings in search of a profit into the stock market -- and, for a time, crypto -- instead of bonds. 

So, what is likely to happen next? 

Either a positive or a negative cycle will emerge. For example, companies might compete for diminishing capital by improving performance and productivity and thus pull money out of bonds, while rising prices create rising profits and better wages. Alternatively, the more competitive conditions might lead to companies failing or downsizing, leading to downward pressure on wages and slackening demand leading towards recession. 

For this reason, Trump's measures protecting US companies and workers from unfair competition are vital. Less vital are any major infrastructure investments -- except the Wall -- as US government debt is already suicidely high.

ELI MOSLEY ATTACKED BY NEW YORK TIMES

Eli Mosley, former head of Identity Europa and one of Richard Spencer's closest lieutenants, has been the subject of the latest hit piece by the New York Times on the Alt-Right. 

A video piece and accompanying article by Emma Cott allege that Mosley (real name  Elliot Kline) is not only a very, very un-nice person, but also lied about his military record.

The video included clips of Kline saying some naughty things about non-Whites in unspecified podcasts. As reported in the accompanying article:

"The podcasts were laced with the most abhorrent racist vulgarities...With me, he insisted that the media unfairly applies labels like white supremacist and neo-Nazi to members of the alt-right “to browbeat white people out of identity politics.” But in the podcasts, recorded less than a year ago, he and his friends were unabashedly racist and anti-Semitic. He also spun tales of being embedded with the Iraqi Army, of being on the lookout for Chechen snipers, and of killing “muds,” a racial slur for Arabs."

Pretty bad optics and pretty (((Stormerist))), so just dumb. But the most damaging allegation made in the documentary is that Kline lied about his military record, claiming to have fought for the US army in Iraq when he hadn't:

"He graduated from high school in 2010 and went straight on to a couple of semesters of college; by the end of 2011, the last troops had left Iraq. They also confirmed that Eli’s unit in the Pennsylvania National Guard did not deploy anywhere else during the roughly six years he served, and neither did he."

Intrepid investigator and 
ear-ring model Emma Cott

Kline has rejected the allegations and has said that he will obtain army records proving that he deployed. This might happen but looks unlikely. Assuming that Cott is a semi-competent journalist, her story will probably hold together.

Meanwhile, Richard Spencer's NPI has released a statement thanking Kline for his past efforts and saying that the allegations are "disturbing" and, if true, would lead to NPI to "reconsider" its relationship with Eli. 

The Alt-Right has a big heart. If Kline admits his past mistakes and disavows his past bad optics and (((Stormerist))) rhetoric, there is no reason why he can't be forgiven and allowed back into the movement.

Now, watch the video. It has some great footage of some of our favourite people...

SJWs OPEN NEXT CIVIL RIGHTS FRONTIER: FOOD STAMPS FOR PETS

It could have been so much worse. They could have started pushing for paedophile rights or the legalisation of polyamorous marriages, but instead it seems that SJWs have decided that the next "big frontier" in civil rights campaigning is to be food stamps for pets!

Over 100,000 people have now signed an online petition asking the US Department of Agriculture, which runs the nation's Food Stamps program, to revise its rules to allow recipients to use their stamps to purchase pet food.

As reported by Fortune magazine: 

The petition was started by someone who says they have been receiving food stamps for “a few months” but is unable to feed their pet.

“Some argue that people should not keep pets if they cannot afford them, but the fact is that an individual or family’s financial status can change at any time,” the petition reads. “Should someone be forced to give up a pet they’ve had for years just because they hit a financial rough patch? Or should they be able to utilize federal aid to continue feeding their pet?…Being poor is hard enough without being expected to give up your companion. For most people, pets are considered family, not property.”

If successful, this would open the door for a massive increase in spending on food stamps, which in the year from October 2016 to October 2017 soared by a massive 5.1%.

Luckily such petitions have little official impact on actual US legislation, which is just as well, as America's public finances are already in a mess, with the federal government on track to borrow an incredible $1 trillion this fiscal year. 

If this kind of overspend continues, Americans, far from being able to feed their pets on the public purse, will probably be forced into eating them at some point in the future.