Wednesday, 31 January 2018
TURKEY'S GERMAN-BUILT TANKS UNABLE TO SUPPORT REGIONAL AMBITIONS
Turkey's ambition to become a major power in the Middle East by expanding its zone of influence in Syria is under threat after an ISIS video revealed alarming weaknesses in its top battle tank, the Leopard II, which is now being deployed against Kurdish forces in Northern Syria.
Over a week ago, the Turks launched a major offensive -- Operation Olive Branch (LOL) -- against the Kurds, who have been armed by the US. But so far the Turks and their Arab allies have failed to capture more than a few tiny villages.
One reason for this relative failure seems to be the shortcomings of the Leopard II tank. The Turkish army has 354 of the tanks, which were built by Germany for a cost of $6 million each and then sold on to Turkey for a cheaper price. These impressive-looking tanks are the reason why Turkey has a strong military reputation in the region.
But it seems that this may be vastly overrated. As reported by the Daily Mail:
"A German-made tank, which Berlin once dubbed one of the best in the world, has had its shortcomings embarrassingly exposed on the battlefield in Syria. Photos from the Turkish military operation dubbed 'Euphrates Shield', which began in August 2016, show the charred remains of one of the Leopard 2 tanks which was reportedly blown up with mines. The images - taken from an ISIS video published in January 2017 - show the tank with its turret completely blown off. Other pictures from the same conflict show Leopard 2s standing idle in ditches and snow after being severely damaged."
Leopard II destroyed by ISIS |
Although it has a V12 twin-turbo engine, a armoured shell made from hardened steel and tungsten, and top speed of 42mph, the tank is clearly vulnerable to 4G warfare tactics, as ISIS has destroyed at least eight of them, using comparatively unsophisticated weapons.
Leopard II tanks have now been seen in Syria, but, as this video shows, they are being used very cautiously for fear of losing more of them.
The weakness of Turkey's armoured forces means that the Kurds and Turks are much more evenly matched than military analysts previously thought. As result it may be time for Turkish President Recep Erdogan to scale back his imperialistic rhetoric. On Friday (26th) he pledged to sweep Kurdish forces from the entire length of the border with Syria and capture the strategic town of Manbij:
"We will clear Manbij of terrorists," Erdogan told local leaders of the governing AK Party in Ankara. "No one should be disturbed by this because the real owners of Manbij are not these terrorists, they are our Arab brothers. From Manbij, we will continue our struggle up to the border with Iraq, until no terrorist is left."
These big words may be hard to carry out if Kurds can inflict the same losses on his tank forces that ISIS formerly did, which seems likely with their superior US-supplied weapons.
BLACK POLITICIANS SHOW DISPLEASURE AT HIGH EMPLOYMENT LEVELS
Shit hole politicians? |
One of the big question to arise from President Trump's recent State of the Union address was whether Blacks actually wanted work or not. This might seem like a no-brainer to most normies, along the lines of "Why would anyone want to be a jobless loser living off welfare and begging?"
But the attitude members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) cast doubt on such an obvious assumption, and suggests that perhaps Black people were in fact happier being unemployed in a relatively rich society where they could still get welfare and handouts, supplemented by occasional petty crime.
The key point in President's address was when he mentioned his administration's impact on Black unemployment:
“Since the election, we have created 2.4 million new jobs, including ... including 200,000 new jobs in manufacturing alone. Tremendous number. After years and years of wage stagnation, we are finally seeing rising wages. Unemployment claims have hit a 45-year low. And something I'm very proud of, African-American unemployment stands at the lowest rate ever recorded.”
Instead of jumping out of their seats and wildly applauding, the Black Congressmen sat on their hands and looked glum, with faces more suited to an atheist funeral than the best news the Black community has had since Lincoln freed the slaves.
But, of course, it is only good news if we assume that African-Americans are the same as other Americans and actually want upwardly mobile lives of useful employment. Sadly, the reaction of the Congressional Black Caucus said something quite different. Was film maker D.W. Griffiths right all those years ago when he suggested that Black politicians were not particularly serious about their job?
Black voters who want self respect clearly deserve better than what the Congressional Black Caucus is offering.
TRUMP "STATE OF THE UNION" A MASSIVE HIT WITH VIEWERS
Trump's first "State of the Union" address on Tuesday night (30th Jan) was a big hit with the audience polls tracking the public's response found, with the majority of voters giving a thumbs up.
Even allowing for the fact that a lot of Democrat supporters didn't tune in, the speech still hit positive territory according to a CBS News poll of 1,178 people. Although only 52% identified as Trump supporters, 75% said they liked the speech. This means that even some of the 32% who identified as Trump opponents liked it, while almost all neutrals liked it.
CBS, it should be remembered is a Jewish-owned network that tends to take a negative line against Trump, as with most of the mainstream media. But even the most anti-Trump channel CNN, which is mainly watched by angry cat ladies, could not stop Trump's speech getting a 48% "very positive" impression.
Despite running this with a churlishly negative headline that focused on the 29% of people who didn't like this, these "very positive" poll numbers exactly matched President Obama's "very positive" rating in the CNN poll carried out after his first "State of the Union" address. But then, twisting the news data in this way is exactly the reason why Trump has deemed them to be "fake news."
Monday, 29 January 2018
CURSE OF TRUMP DESCENDS ON JAY-Z AT GRAMMYS?
World famous hip-hop musician and producer Jay-Z is the latest victim to fall foul of the dreaded "Curse of Trump" after his eight nominations failed to gain a single prize at this year's Grammy awards following a public row with President Trump.
Not only this but a video also went viral showing Jay-Z humiliatingly being ordered around by his 6-year-old daughter.
The bad luck for the ugly, camel-faced mulatto celebrity came after he called President Trump a "superbug" on CNN’s The Van Jones Show on Saturday night (27th).
Butthurt by Trump accurately describing Haiti and several African countries as "shit holes," Jay-Z, who is mainly famous for being married to brassy, big-thighed singer Beyonce, compared Trump to Donald Sterling, the Jewish owner of the LA Clippers, who, in 2014, told his young girlfriend not to shag Black athletes.
Jay-Z said that the the media outrage at the time had only had a superficial impact on underlying "racism" and may even have made it stronger:
"You haven’t fixed anything," he said. "You have sprayed perfume on the trash can. What you do when you do that is the bugs come. You spray something and you create a superbug because you don’t take care of the problem. You don’t take the trash out, you keep spraying whatever over it to make it acceptable. As those things grow, you create a superbug. And then now we have Donald Trump, the superbug."
Following the show's broadcast, Trump hit back by reminding Jay-Z how good he had been for Black voters:
Despite being a clumsy attempt to insult President Trump, the "superbug" comment was also an unfortunate analogy, because the countries Trump allegedly described as "shit holes" are much more likely to suffer from bugs and superbugs than anywhere else.
Although Jay-Z is a no-talent fake musician who mainly steals tracks and beats from much more talented musicians, he is highly thought of in the parasitical music business. This -- combined with the heavy moral signalling against Trump -- should have ensured Jay-Z at least 3 or 4 awards from his 8 nominations, as the music industry is also extremely culturally Marxist.
In the event he ended up with ZERO, reminding us once again that getting on President Trump's bad side may unlock powerful, dark, occult forces that can blight a celebrity's life and career. Perhaps in future Jay-Z will tread more carefully when his path crosses that of the God Emperor, and stay in his "shit hole" industry, rather than commenting on things that don't concern him.
Anyway, I hear Haiti is "wonderful" this time of year.
Anyway, I hear Haiti is "wonderful" this time of year.
SUSPICIOUS DEATH OF "RUSSIA TODAY" FOUNDER
Mikhail Lesin, President Putin's former personal adviser on media affairs and the founder of Russia Today, was found dead in a Washington hotel room back in 2015. The cause of death given was a heart attack.
But now the story has changed after an FBI report was released on Saturday (27th) that showed Lesin died as a result of blunt force injuries to his head. As the heavily redacted document puts it:
"Mr. Lesin died as a result of blunt force injuries to his head, with contributing causes being blunt force injuries of the neck, torso, upper extremities, and lower extremities, which were induced by falls, with acute ethanol intoxication."
There are two possibilities here, either Lesin got really, really drunk and then started breakdancing against the furniture, battering himself to death in the process, or else it was a hit job.
With regard to the second possibility, the fact that Lesin was a former Kremlin insider staying at a hotel in Washington DC seems highly significant. Was Lesin in town to do a deal dishing dirt on his former boss? Such a possibility provides a clear motive for any hit man.
Russia Today really loved the Alt-Right when Obama was President. |
Lesin served as Minister of Press and Mass Media from 1999 to 2004, then as a presidential media adviser from 2004 to 2009. It was during his time as Minister of Press and Mass Media that he oversaw the creation of Russia Today, the Russian state's overseas media arm, launched in 2005.
From 2013 to 2015 Lesin was chief executive officer at Garprom-Media, a position he is thought to have been forced out of. He then moved to Los Angeles, where his family had bought considerable properties, far in excess of his paid worth.
The trajectory here is clear -- a high-powered Kremlin insider with plenty of secrets to sell, moving further and further away from his former boss. Not exactly the most healthy ingredients to mix in that final fatal cocktail, especially when the boss is Vladimir Putin.
Also, why is this coming out now? The FBI have been sitting on this for around two years. This wouldn't be anything to do with the fact that Putin is up for re-election this March? Nah, coincidences like that never happen, do they?
BIG SURPRISE: LEFTISTS CREATE MORE VOMIT-INDUCING ART
The Left really like making cunts of themselves, and not just metaphorically either, as a lame-brained feminist artist has started encouraging women to "express themselves" by making prints of their twats. As reported by the always classy Metro, Britain's leading free newspaper:
"44-year-old artist and educator Lee is the creator of the Unfold Project, which asks those with vaginas to do vulva body prints in the name self discovery and body positivity. The process is a lot like getting your fingerprint taken… but with your genitals.
It’s a form of relief printing so each resulting print captures all the details and specifics of your body. ‘The project has been knocking around in my head for a while,’ Lee tells Metro.co.uk. ‘So many aspects of media send unhelpful messages about bodies. ‘I’ve been interested in ideas about representation and the role artists and creators can play as well as what responsibility they may have to help normalize a wide range of body images.
‘I had a hunch that body printing would be an interesting way to capture the beauty and diversity of vulva while at the same time being accessible enough that it’s relatively easy to do."
The project is supposed to get women to think of their cunts as "beautiful" and so boost their confidence in their bodies, but most of the images created are objectively so ugly that this seems absurd. Some of the images were even made while the women involved were "on the rag" FFS!
In fact I can't think of a more effective way of trashing a woman's physical self-confidence that by focusing on one of her ugliest features in this grotesque way. In fact the only reason most men want to see women's twats is because they have been habitually hidden for millennia. Exposing them in this way will simply make most of men turn away and retch.
The key to beauty and eroticism is often in what is not shown, but don't expect the kind of brain-damaged people who become Leftists and feminists to understand this eternal truth.
The key to beauty and eroticism is often in what is not shown, but don't expect the kind of brain-damaged people who become Leftists and feminists to understand this eternal truth.
NON-WHITES IN LONDON NOW REMOVING WHITES WITH NON-ISLAMIC "TRUCKS OF PEACE"
The enrichment that diversity brings has many forms, and one of the most noticeable changes are the new technologies and methods of doing things that it ushers in.
A few years ago it was the "Truck of Peace," an exciting new form of directly effecting demographic change while also encouraging "White Flight." Because London, if it is about anything, is all about demographic change, "White Flight," and the replacement of the original British population, as Mayor Sadiq Khan and Labour MP Diane Abbot will readily attest.
The only drawback with the "Truck of Peace" was that it had to be driven by a fully committed Muslim, a group that can occasionally be in short supply due to "Allah akbaring" commitments elsewhere in the World.
Now diversity has managed to improve on this method by introducing a new revolutionary non-Muslim "Truck of Peace" that can be driven by any non-white person whatsoever, especially if they have a classic third-world mixture of medium-to-low IQ and chip-on-the-shoulder, garish machismo.
Now diversity has managed to improve on this method by introducing a new revolutionary non-Muslim "Truck of Peace" that can be driven by any non-white person whatsoever, especially if they have a classic third-world mixture of medium-to-low IQ and chip-on-the-shoulder, garish machismo.
The new breakthrough in diversity technology was made by 28-year-old Jaynesh Chudasama, a young man of ethnic Indian Gujarati background, who managed to demographically eliminate three young White men before they could reproduce by driving into them at high speed with a black Audi as they were walking down a street in West London, one of the few parts of the Sadiq Khan's London that still has a sizeable White community.
The three victims have been named by police as Harry Rice, 17, George Wilkinson, 16, and Josh Mcgunniess, 16. All three boys were pronounced dead at the scene.
Chudasama’s breakthrough means that it will now be possible to carry out radical demographic change in London without first shouting "Allah Akbar."
Too young to die, too White to live. |
Saturday, 27 January 2018
RICHARD WOLSTENCROFT: TRUMP YEAR ZERO
One Year of Donald Trump’s Rule! Who ever thought we would get this far? Let’s take a look at what I cheekily call "Trump Year Zero," as I do believe his appearance on the world stage represents a true paradigm shift in global geopolitics, both nationally and internationally. The term "Year Zero" has an air that is both messianic and evocative of the shock/horror of Pol Pot's radical takeover of Cambodia So, that sure is a fun mix. But, first some housekeeping, a little back story, and a few small caveats.
Even within Alt Right and Alt Lite circles, I am considered a bit of a one-eyed Trump supporter. I take that as a fair assessment. I have never openly sworn my allegiance to the Alt Right or Alt Lite, and probably gravitate to the more non-White Nationalist Alt Lite end that tends to see protecting Western Civilisation in itself as the most suitable focus for our efforts in the oversensitive political climate of the day, but I have publicly endorsed Donald Trump. That’s not always an easy road, especially when one works in the arts and cinema scenes down-under or otherwise.
I have a keen intellectual interest in the New Right and especially the new Right Wing Populism that has swept many electoral polls across the West, of which Trump and Brexit were the two most stunning examples. This interest of mine dates back to my study of Right-wing political thought and my degree in political philosophy from La Trobe University (1999-03). I have been accused of being Alt-Right-esque (along with people like Jordan Petersen, Paul Joseph Watson, Gavin McInnes, Stefan Molyneux, and a host of others), and that is probably a fair enough statement as this new politics does indeed interest me and I am a sporadic contributor here for Alternative Right, overseen by Colin Liddell and Andy Nowicki, two of the smarter, more switched-on, dialectical, humorous, and interesting voices in the broader New Right. So, considering all this, I thought I might take a look back over Donald Trump’s first year—or, as I determined to call it, "Donald Trump, Year Zero!"
First, a little history of my previous writing on the Trump juggernaut. I predicted Trump’s win as early as February 2016, with my essay here, "Trump and the Metapolitics of Winning." I was one of the first to note the incredible hostility to Trump from the mainstream US media and Washington establishment in my essay "Get Trump." I hinted that a few Globalists might get on board "Team Trump" before he won, and just in case he did. I also wrote two influential pieces, where I compared Donald Trump to the "benevolent gangster trope," rather like the character of Don Corleone in The Godfather. Steve Bannon made a few Don references apropos Trump along the same lines, which made me wonder whether he had read them.
Anyway, the one-year anniversary is an auspicious time to look back over Trump’s annus mirabilis (or horribilis if you prefer) and see the many things he has done, the things he has had difficulty doing, and the obstacles that stand in the way of him fully achieving his vision.
To say that Trump's victory took the elite by surprise is like saying that the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79AD took the the people of Pompeii by surpirise. Yes, they were surprised as f**k, and almost turned to stone, like those figures buried under the ash of the Roman volcano. They were seared by the "Trump Combustion" that blasted through the corridors of power that day, and overwhelmed what they thought was an invincible bulwark in the person of Hillary Clinton. Regardless of what you think of Hillary, she was and is a tough competitor. Ask any of her main critics and leakers! Oh, you can't, can you, as they are dead, LOL.
It’s been a busy year for the Don after sidelining the opposing Clinton Crime Family. I would like to outline some of his key achievements in my more Meta view of his Presidency.
I think the number one achievement of Trump is he is a true Paradigm Shifter, grabbing the wheel of Western Civilisation and steering it away—potentially—from a few large icebergs and tidal pools that lay ahead. Bret Easton Ellis called him "The Great Disruptor" on his podcast show, and I think the title sticks for me. He is the greater upsetter of apple carts and over turner of various cosy games of monopoly—both public and private—that were under way.
The effect of Trump and his difference of vision and direction has far exceeded any other President of the postwar era. It was a startling breath of fresh air and it certainly connected with enough of the electorate to sweep him to power. He’s what my old political philosophy professor Robert Farrell might have called "a circuit breaker." When a moribund system is so corrupt and slowed down by the very entropy of its own ennui, something has got to give. And Trump is that something, that catalyst, popping the bubble of a small-L "liberal" world.
Read the rest of the article HERE
Even within Alt Right and Alt Lite circles, I am considered a bit of a one-eyed Trump supporter. I take that as a fair assessment. I have never openly sworn my allegiance to the Alt Right or Alt Lite, and probably gravitate to the more non-White Nationalist Alt Lite end that tends to see protecting Western Civilisation in itself as the most suitable focus for our efforts in the oversensitive political climate of the day, but I have publicly endorsed Donald Trump. That’s not always an easy road, especially when one works in the arts and cinema scenes down-under or otherwise.
I have a keen intellectual interest in the New Right and especially the new Right Wing Populism that has swept many electoral polls across the West, of which Trump and Brexit were the two most stunning examples. This interest of mine dates back to my study of Right-wing political thought and my degree in political philosophy from La Trobe University (1999-03). I have been accused of being Alt-Right-esque (along with people like Jordan Petersen, Paul Joseph Watson, Gavin McInnes, Stefan Molyneux, and a host of others), and that is probably a fair enough statement as this new politics does indeed interest me and I am a sporadic contributor here for Alternative Right, overseen by Colin Liddell and Andy Nowicki, two of the smarter, more switched-on, dialectical, humorous, and interesting voices in the broader New Right. So, considering all this, I thought I might take a look back over Donald Trump’s first year—or, as I determined to call it, "Donald Trump, Year Zero!"
First, a little history of my previous writing on the Trump juggernaut. I predicted Trump’s win as early as February 2016, with my essay here, "Trump and the Metapolitics of Winning." I was one of the first to note the incredible hostility to Trump from the mainstream US media and Washington establishment in my essay "Get Trump." I hinted that a few Globalists might get on board "Team Trump" before he won, and just in case he did. I also wrote two influential pieces, where I compared Donald Trump to the "benevolent gangster trope," rather like the character of Don Corleone in The Godfather. Steve Bannon made a few Don references apropos Trump along the same lines, which made me wonder whether he had read them.
Anyway, the one-year anniversary is an auspicious time to look back over Trump’s annus mirabilis (or horribilis if you prefer) and see the many things he has done, the things he has had difficulty doing, and the obstacles that stand in the way of him fully achieving his vision.
To say that Trump's victory took the elite by surprise is like saying that the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79AD took the the people of Pompeii by surpirise. Yes, they were surprised as f**k, and almost turned to stone, like those figures buried under the ash of the Roman volcano. They were seared by the "Trump Combustion" that blasted through the corridors of power that day, and overwhelmed what they thought was an invincible bulwark in the person of Hillary Clinton. Regardless of what you think of Hillary, she was and is a tough competitor. Ask any of her main critics and leakers! Oh, you can't, can you, as they are dead, LOL.
It’s been a busy year for the Don after sidelining the opposing Clinton Crime Family. I would like to outline some of his key achievements in my more Meta view of his Presidency.
I think the number one achievement of Trump is he is a true Paradigm Shifter, grabbing the wheel of Western Civilisation and steering it away—potentially—from a few large icebergs and tidal pools that lay ahead. Bret Easton Ellis called him "The Great Disruptor" on his podcast show, and I think the title sticks for me. He is the greater upsetter of apple carts and over turner of various cosy games of monopoly—both public and private—that were under way.
The effect of Trump and his difference of vision and direction has far exceeded any other President of the postwar era. It was a startling breath of fresh air and it certainly connected with enough of the electorate to sweep him to power. He’s what my old political philosophy professor Robert Farrell might have called "a circuit breaker." When a moribund system is so corrupt and slowed down by the very entropy of its own ennui, something has got to give. And Trump is that something, that catalyst, popping the bubble of a small-L "liberal" world.
Read the rest of the article HERE
Friday, 26 January 2018
POETIC JUSTICE FOR SPENCER'S MAD GYM LADY
Swastika eyes: Christine Fair |
Christine Fair, the demented feminist professor who picked a fight with Richard Spencer at a gym back in May last year, because she was sure he was a "Nazi," has met poetic justice in Germany where she was arrested for using the dreaded N-word too "liberally."
As reported in the English version of Deutsche Welle:
An angry American traveler found herself plunged into German legal waters this month after allegedly calling federal police officers "Nazis" during a dispute at Frankfurt International Airport.
Police say the woman, a 49-year-old professor, became "unreasonable and irritated" when they told her she had too many liquids in her carry-on during a screening for explosives.
The issue of too many liquids morphed quickly — by her own account – into a tail-chasing argument over her deodorant: They insisted it must go; she claimed that made no sense since it was a solid.
It was approximately at this point that police allege she called them "f--ing bastards" and "f--ing German Nazi police." But she says she never called the police "Nazis." What they heard was her wondering why she caught flack instead of the "Nazi-looking dude" with a "Hitler's youth haircut" in line behind her.
The result of the altercation: preliminary criminal proceedings against the woman on suspicion of slander, plus a $260-bill (€207) upfront for any subsequent legal expenses."
Fair obviously likes getting into tense situations where she is exposed to male power. |
What makes this even more laughable is that the "Nazi" airport guards she allegedly called "f--ing German Nazi police," were hardly the finest examples of pure Bavarian phenotype available. In fact it seems that they didn't even have blond hair. As Fair, who is Jewish, wrote in a 4,000-word tirade about the incident for the Huffington Post (yes, they will literally publish any crap):
"The short fellow who accused me of calling Austav a Nazi was now repeating his account to Mehrinj. As Mehrinj took his credential, I saw his name: S. Kapoor. Kapoor went ballistic that I knew his name. What kind of democracy is Germany where an individual has a right to perjure himself about a person but the victim of this perjury doesn’t have a right to know the name of her slanderer?"
Yes, two non-Germans -- Mehrinj (apparently a Muslim name) and Kapoor (an Indian Hindu name) -- trying to deal with the ever-present threat of terrorism from other non-Germans in a society where the original stock is fast becoming a minority, are now "NAZIS."
Fair is obviously the kind of leftist nutjob who tastes "Nazis" in her sandwiches, and probably gets into situations like this all the time. But this time it looks like God decided to have a laugh at the expense of this vile, cantankerous cat lady, because, whatever else Richard Spencer is, he cannot claim to be a true "gas the K***s" Nazi -- to be that you have to have at least a Jewish mother.
Fair is obviously the kind of leftist nutjob who tastes "Nazis" in her sandwiches, and probably gets into situations like this all the time. But this time it looks like God decided to have a laugh at the expense of this vile, cantankerous cat lady, because, whatever else Richard Spencer is, he cannot claim to be a true "gas the K***s" Nazi -- to be that you have to have at least a Jewish mother.
Thursday, 25 January 2018
WHITE GENOCIDE ALREADY HAPPENED IN NORTH AMERICA
With the percentage of the White population continuing to fall on the North American Continent, White genocide is a major concern for identitarians, White nationalists, and Alt-Righters.
But new findings confirm that White genocide has already happened in North America. The twist is it happened tens of thousands of years ago, as new archaeological evidence makes it clear that Stone Age hunters from Europe discovered and settled America, before being overwhelmed by a prehistorical form of mass immigration, as the ancestors of the Red Indians came over and swamped and exterminated them.
As reported by the Independent:
New archaeological evidence suggests that America was first discovered by Stone Age people from Europe – 10,000 years before the Siberian-originating ancestors of the American Indians set foot in the New World.
A remarkable series of several dozen European-style stone tools, dating back between 19,000 and 26,000 years, have been discovered at six locations along the US east coast. Three of the sites are on the Delmarva Peninsular in Maryland, discovered by archaeologist Dr Darrin Lowery of the University of Delaware. One is in Pennsylvania and another in Virginia. A sixth was discovered by scallop-dredging fishermen on the seabed 60 miles from the Virginian coast on what, in prehistoric times, would have been dry land.
The new discoveries are among the most important archaeological breakthroughs for several decades - and are set to add substantially to our understanding of humanity's spread around the globe.
The Europeans who originally made America their home were from the Solutrean cultures of France and Iberia, according to Professor Dennis Stanford, of the Smithsonian Institution in Washington DC, and Professor Bruce Bradley of the University of Exeter, the two leading archaeologists who have analysed the evidence and will present their detailed findings in a new book – Across Atlantic Ice – published this month. According to their research, the European settlers moved around a rim of ice joining Europe to North America in the Ice Age.
One reason why Europeans were the first to settle America was because Siberia was actually too cold to have a significant number of humans, but after the global climate warmed, it became more difficult for other Europeans to move to North America, but instead easier for Siberian populations to migrate via the narrow Bering Strait, separating Siberia from Alaska.
"Whereas the Solutreans had only had a 4500 year long ‘Ice Age’ window to carry out their migratory activity, the Asian-originating Indians had some 15,000 years to do it. What’s more, the latter two-thirds of that 15 millennia long period was climatologically much more favourable and substantially larger numbers of Asians were therefore able to migrate.
As a result of these factors the Solutrean (European originating) Native Americans were either partly absorbed by the newcomers or were substantially obliterated by them either physically or through competition for resources."
This last bit is important because if our Solutrean cousins had lost the American continent in a fair fight with the later Siberian invaders, then a good case could be made for the "Native Americans" having at least some moral claim to the continent, on the basis of being a stronger and more developed strain of the human race thousands of years ago.
But the data shows us that this wasn't a fair fight, because Europeans were unable to reinforce the initial settlement of North America after the ice receded; whereas fresh waves of Asians were able to pour across the narrow Bering Straits, essentially meaning that European man was horrendously outnumbered in the earlier struggle for the North American continent.
Those Europeans who later sailed to the New World and re-conquered the land from the Red Indians were, in a sense, reclaiming the patrimony of a branch of their race.
But the data shows us that this wasn't a fair fight, because Europeans were unable to reinforce the initial settlement of North America after the ice receded; whereas fresh waves of Asians were able to pour across the narrow Bering Straits, essentially meaning that European man was horrendously outnumbered in the earlier struggle for the North American continent.
Those Europeans who later sailed to the New World and re-conquered the land from the Red Indians were, in a sense, reclaiming the patrimony of a branch of their race.
The unassimilated modern-day descendants of ancient illegal immigrants to North America. |
Wednesday, 24 January 2018
KREMLIN TAKES RUSSIA INSIDER TO THE WOOD SHED OVER SITE'S NEW "ANTI-SEMITIC" DIRECTION
It seems that the Kremlin is getting picky about the kind of support it gets from pro-Kremlin shills in the West, especially when it is dished up by someone who has "flipped over" into the "dark side" of hard-core, blanket anti-Semitism.
A couple of weeks ago, Russia Insider, a US-based site that claims 10 million views a month, decided that the Jews were the main obstacle facing Putin's Russia, and published an article entitled, "It's Time to Drop the Jew Taboo: It's making serious discussion of Russian geopolitics and history next to impossible." Written by the site's owner, Charles Bausmann, it essentially went with the idea, already common in many parts of the Alt-Right, that the Jews, as a people, are predisposed towards nefarious and malevolent behavior:
"The problem seems to arise when Jews get into positions of influence, i.e., when they join the dreaded 'elites.' Then, for some reason, regardless of their political sympathies or other particulars, they get up to no good - and something goes seriously wrong. Maybe the powerful Jewish institutions - the media, the banks, the movie studios, the music industry, etc, are in the hands of degenerates who demand bad behavior as the price of admission, and then enforce it. I really don't know, but obviously, the question begs for an examination, as the evidence suggests that much of human enterprise dominated and shaped by Jews is a bottomless pit of trouble with a peculiar penchant for mendacity and cynicism, hostility to Christianity and Christian values, and in geopolitics, a clear bloodlust."
The JQ is a tricky one, and should only ever be tackled from a perspective that is informed by deep scholarship, like that of Dr. Kevin MacDonald, fair-mindedness, and an emotionally neutral outlook.
Once emotions become involved, it is extremely easy for anyone, even someone telling the absolute truth, to come across as a hate-filled bigot -- or to be presented as such.
This is the pit into which sites like the Daily Stormer and The Right Stuff, who produce the Daily Shoah podcast, have fallen into. So far, Russia Insider has not fallen into those kinds of excesses, and has avoided the K-word and references to gas ovens, etc. But by presenting all Jews as a collective and strongly characterizing their behaviour in over-simplistic terms, it has lost a lot of nuance and subtlety in its approach.
Bausmann when the Kremlin thought he understood what they were doing. |
"An outrageous anti-Semitic tirade on an American ‘pro-Russia’ blog-site proves that the inability to properly understand Russia often extends to westerners who think they are ‘supporting’ the country.
Since its inception, there have been numerous reasons to laugh at Russia Insider. There’s the way it brazenly steals content from professional news outlets and repackages it, with a twist. Not to mention the pseudo-messianic zeal of its founders, displayed in its initial fundraising videos. But it’s definitely not funny anymore...
we have a situation where a bunch of westerners are harming Russia by using the country’s name to promote an agenda which isn’t part of Russian discourse. And this is a phenomenon displayed in the behaviour of many zealots, who ‘support’ Russia as keyboard-warrior crusaders but don’t understand the place at all, in reality."
But while Russia Insider's recent anti-Semitic stance can be critiqued as politically naive and coming from what the article itself admits is only a partial understanding of the subject, the fact remains that there is a Jewish question to be answered.
Bryan MacDonald's article ignores this by going to the other extreme, pretending that Russia is a multicultural paradise in which Jews always play a positive role. In this he apes the worst excesses of Soviet propaganda, rather than effectively critiquing Bausman's recent change of direction.
Bryan MacDonald's article ignores this by going to the other extreme, pretending that Russia is a multicultural paradise in which Jews always play a positive role. In this he apes the worst excesses of Soviet propaganda, rather than effectively critiquing Bausman's recent change of direction.
"Anyway, rather than dwelling further on Bausman’s appalling spiel," Bryan MacDonald writes, "I’d rather think of figures such as the scientist Vitaly Ginzburg, the poet Osip Mandelstam, the novelist Boris Pasternak and the Chess master Alexander Khalifman. Not to mention contemporary public figures of Jewish descent like Vladimir Pozner, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, Anzhelika Varum and Alexander Gordon. Who all add to the gaiety of the nation and do Russia some service. In contrast to Russia Insider’s pathetic attempt to hijack and attach Russian identity to its scandalous anti-Semitic slime."
The JQ is always tricky, but one thing is clear, a smart cookie like Vladimir Putin is not about to shackle himself to someone who is showing the first signs of developing an Andrew Anglin complex, even if his strategy in the Middle East is already deeply undermining the Jewish state.
Tuesday, 23 January 2018
FARAGE JOINS FORCES WITH BOLTON TO ATTACK UKIP OLIGARCHS
When Henry Bolton was elected leader of UKIP a few months ago, it seemed like a stitch up. He was relatively unknown and Ann Marie Waters -- a strong critic of Islamization -- had a groundswell of support from the members. But since then, Bolton has come into his own, dumping his 3rd wife for a much younger woman, whom the mainstream media thinks is a nasty "racist."
In the circumstances, Bolton did the predictable thing for a UKIP leader and officially separated from his new girlfriend. But, this being 21st century Britcuckistan, just his mere association with a woman who tweeted that she didn't fancy Black men and thought Prince Harry's bride-to-be would 'taint" the Royal Family, was grounds enough to oust him from the UKIP leadership.
The driving force here is the party's National Execute Council (NEC), a select group of Party insiders whose main job is to steer the party perpetually in the wrong direction, while doing the opposite of what the grass roots members want.
Using the absurd excuse that Bolton had shown "unacceptable incompetence" merely because he was the subject of a few gutter press stories, the NEC yesterday passed a motion of no confidence in Bolton, voting 14 votes to one, the one vote against being that of Bolton himself. In addition to this, most of the party's main spokesmen have now resigned from their positions.
The unanimity and speed with which these groups acted was designed to make it impossible for Bolton to continue on as leader and so force his resignation.
But rather than following that script, Bolton has dug his heels in and refused to go, forcing the NEC to call a General Meeting of members to vote on the issue.
Bolton is now banking on the rank-and-file members to save him. But he is also going on the offensive, saying that if they vote for him, he will have a mandate to change the members of the NEC and greatly reduce its power in the party.
This is also what the former UKIP leader Nigel Farage clearly wants, having had many run-ins with the NEC during his time as leader. Now Farage has come out and thrown his considerable weight behind Bolton.
Writing in the Daily Telegraph, Farage said:
"As one party spokesman after another resigns, I am reminded of the nightmare Jeremy Corbyn faced in 2016 when 21 members of his shadow cabinet resigned. Corbyn was written off by the press, but the rank and file membership saved him.
If Bolton has the courage and the vision to introduce a new constitution, and shows that he can be a strong spokesman for Britain leaving the single market, taking back its fisheries and restoring pride in the UK, he may well surprise all of his critics too."
There are three points to make here. First, Bolton and Farage are essentially civic nationalist cucks by Alt-Right standards, so even if the NEC are worse than them, none of this means very much, outside its entertainment value.
Second, the NEC's main function is to restrict the populist impulses of the rank-and-file members of the party. As these impulses have at least the potential to push things in a more nationalist direction, anything that weakens the NEC is probably a good thing.
Third, the move to get rid of Bolton is relying, to an absurd extent, on stretching the R-word beyong all sanity, with the NEC now saying that even if you kowtow to the PC shibboleths, as Bolton has done, you can still be cast out because a person you associated with is later shown to have said un-PC things.
Monday, 22 January 2018
AFRICAN GANGS RAMPAGE, IRISH AUTHORITIES WORRY ABOUT NON-EXISTENT VIGILANTES
The Irish fought against the British for centuries so they would be free to enjoy this. |
Ireland is really being enriched by multiculturalism. For example, Lusk was a just a boring, pretty village to the North of Dublin until Saturday (20th) when one of Dublin's many ethnic gangs decided to have a "day in the country" and liven things up with some random acts of violence and vandalism. As reported by the DublinLive website:
The gang, reportedly calling itself ‘the K45 Crew’, moves between Blanchardstown and north county Dublin and is responsible for a series of unprovoked assaults. On Saturday, residents in Lusk were forced into lock-down after around 100 teenagers invaded the village, throwing stones at buses and smashing up property.
Gardai [Irish police] were alerted shortly after they got off the train in nearby Rush. They rounded up the gang members and escorted them back to the station.
One eyewitness said: “About 15 of them ran down my road. Riot gardai got them. They were out for trouble, hitting the gardai and hiding behind bins. Some of them hid in fields as well. The whole platform was full when they were putting them back on the train.”
Apparently this is part of Ireland's fast evolving gang culture, where competing ethnic gangs nominate a neutral venue outside their gang enclaves in Dublin, in order to arrange fights and also terrorise residents in areas where there is an extremely low police presence because of high-trust White communities.
"Over the past 18 months, teen gangs have regularly travelled for fights arranged on social media to Donabate, Malahide and Swords. Gardai suspect the gang, which has African origins, is behind a string of attacks and robberies in Ongar, Mulhuddart, Tyrellstown and Clonee.
There have been several arrests in recent months for assault causing harm, possession of an offensive weapon and violent disorder."
But rather than taking Draconian measures against these scum and deporting them and their families to countries more suited to their anarchic presence, cucked Irish authorities are now mainly worried about local residents organising to defend themselves.
Last month protesters in the nearby seaside village of Balbriggan took to the streets to demand a more visible police presence in the town, which they say is in the grip of gang rule.
Meanwhile the media and local politicians are less worried about what the gangs are doing and more concerned by the mere possibility that local residents may do something to confront the gangs.
Local councillor Tom O’Leary of the cuckservative Fine Gael party appealed for calm, when actually being calm is a rather shit response to a rampaging mob of Third Worlders in your formerly peaceful village.
"Neighbourhood Watch is the best way to deal with this," O'Leary told the Dublin Gazette. “It is a tried and tested method and it works."
Nice theory, bro. What is clearly needed here is some simple A/B testing, pitting "Neighbourhood Watching" against the mass deportation of thuggish Third World migrants, so that we can finally see which method works best.
Remember that "Multiculturalism" is just code for "We think they are too dumb and savage to assimilate."
Remember that "Multiculturalism" is just code for "We think they are too dumb and savage to assimilate."
"BIG BRAINED NIBBA" STEVEN PINKER JOINS THE ALT-RIGHT
Why is the Alt-Right winning? Top Harvard academic and "big brained nibba" Steven Pinker -- author off The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature and The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined -- says he has the answer.
Speaking at a panel discussion at Harvard University, the Jewish intellectual said it was because the Alt-Right simply told the truth, calling the kind of people drawn to our uncompromising message “highly literate, highly intelligent people.”
“When they are exposed to true statements that have never been voiced on college campuses, in the New York Times, or in 'respectable' media, almost like to a bacillus to which they have no immunity, they are immediately infected, both with a feeling of outrage that these truths are unsayable and no defence against taking them to what we might consider to be rather repellent conclusions,” he told the stunned panel and audience.
To illustrate his thesis Pinker then cited some "hate facts" -- i.e. said things that are incontrovertibly true but which only the Alt-Right has the balls to discuss. In this way he subtly signalled to his audience that he had in fact crossed over and joined our glorious movement. The hate facts included the following:
- Capitalist societies are better than communist ones
- Men and women are not identical in their life priorities, sexuality, tastes, and interests
- Different ethnic groups commit violent crimes at different rates
Regarding the first point, he said:
"If you doubt it just ask yourself the question, would I rather live in South Korea or North Korea? Would I rather live in West Germany in the 1970s or East Germany…? I submit that this is not really a controversial statement but on university campuses it is considered flamingly radical."
He then defended deeply ingrained sexual differences by referring to the data:
"This is not controversial to anyone who has even glanced at the data, the kind of vocational interest tests of the kind your high school guidance counsellor gave you. It's been given to millions of people, and men and women give different answers to what they want to do for a living, and how much time they want to allocate to family versus career, and so on."
While on racial differences he cited the commonly accepted databases:
"...different ethnic groups commit violent crimes at different rates. You can go to the Bureau of Justice statistics and look it up on their website. The homicide rate among African Americans is seven or eight times higher than it is among European Americans. And terrorism, go to the Global Terror database and you find that worldwide the overall majority of suicide terrorist acts are committed by Islamist extremist groups."
This major defection from academia to our movement will now kick off infighting among Alt-Righters over whether we want Harvard Jewish intellectuals like Pinker in the movement, especially when we already have so many towering intellects.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)